The NATO Treaty Needs Amendment or the US Should Quit

By Vincent J. Truglia

Given developments in Ukraine, it is clear that the US should review the existing NATO Treaty, and either have it amended or the US should withdraw from the alliance.  This may be shocking to some, but I doubt many Americans realize how risky the treaty has become for the United States. The rapid accession of relatively small Eastern and Central European countries has changed the nature of NATO.

The risk lies within Article 5 of the treaty, which basically says that if any NATO country is attacked, it would be considered an attack on all NATO countries, and therefore other NATO countries would have to come to the aid of that country.

Article 5

The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defense recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

This was all well and good when the West was faced with a Communist threat centered in Eastern Europe.  The countries other NATO countries were pledging to protect represented vital interests to the other member states.

Rapid Accession of Small Countries

However, after the fall of the Soviet Union, the Communist threat disappeared.  What happened is that a number of smaller former East bloc countries joined NATO, including Albania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, Slovakia, and most dangerously, the three Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia.  None of these countries represent a vital national interest to the US.  I doubt most Americans realize that if there is a Russian move into Estonia or Latvia, that the US might be drawn into a war with a nuclear-armed Russia.

Estonia and Latvia

The risks are especially large regarding Estonia and Latvia in that both countries have large Russian-speaking minoriites, which are generally, by most international standards, treated as second-class citizens.  Given developments in Ukraine, it would not be surprising if Russia demands better treatment for Russian speaking minorities in both these countries even more forcefully than in the past.  Lithuania is far less a risk because it doesn’t have a large Russian speaking minority.

Frankly, I would hope that before Russian military force becomes a real threat, that Estonia and Latvia would better respect their Russian-speaking minorities. If they don’t, and Russia intervenes in either one, I would absolutely oppose the use of force by the US to prevent such intervention by Russia.


Poland is one Eastern European country, which I believe is of vital interest to the US. As a result of World War II’s redrawing of boundaries in Eastern and Central Europe, Poland got shifted westward, so that now the Polish border is a mere 60 miles or about 100 kilometers from Berlin.  Any attack on Poland should and would require a military response because of its proximity to Germany.

Article 12

How could this problem be resolved?  The US could invoke Article 12 of the Treaty, which allows for a review of the Treaty.  The US could then demand that it will only come to the defense of certain NATO countries, not necessarily all of them, or in some way make it discretionary.  The Treaty says: 

After the Treaty has been in force for ten years, or at any time thereafter, the Parties shall, if any of them so requests, consult together for the purpose of reviewing the Treaty, having regard for the factors then affecting peace and security in the North Atlantic area, including the development of universal as well as regional arrangements under the Charter of the United Nations for the maintenance of international peace and security.

Article 13 

If other NATO members do not agree, then the US could invoke Article 13, which allows any country to leave the alliance with one year’s notice.

I believe that instead of dismantling NATO, the core NATO states would prefer an amendment to the treaty rather than a US departure from the alliance.


I don’t want to put our military at risk to protect Estonia and Latvia, especially since their treatment of their Russian-speaking minority is poor. Also, I strongly believe almost all Americans would not want to go to war if Albania, Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, or Slovakia were attacked.  Most Americans wouldn’t even know where these countries are on a map. They are certainly not of vital interest to the US.

As always, Clear and Candid.